ACADEMY PUBLIC POLICIES

 The development of health policies in community health is crucial for improving public health outcomes, ensuring equitable access to healthcare, and addressing the specific needs of populations.

The first essential tip for developing effective health policies is to engage stakeholders actively. Stakeholder engagement involves including a wide range of individuals and groups, such as healthcare professionals, community members, policymakers, and organizations. Engaging stakeholders helps ensure that policies reflect the actual needs and priorities of the community. Historically, successful health policies, like the Affordable Care Act in the United States, showcased how stakeholder involvement can lead to better outcomes. By involving stakeholders, policy developers can gather diverse perspectives, leading to a more comprehensive understanding of community health challenges.

The second tip is to utilize evidence-based decision-making. This involves making policy decisions based on the best available research and data. Policymakers should leverage studies, surveys, and statistical analyses to identify health trends and issues. For instance, the implementation of smoking bans in public spaces was supported by robust evidence showing the negative health impacts of second-hand smoke. By prioritizing evidence, health policies can be more effective and have greater impact on community well-being.

The third tip emphasizes the importance of incorporating cultural competency into health policies. Communities are often diverse, and understanding cultural differences is key to delivering effective health services. Policymakers should ensure that health messaging is culturally relevant and accessible. For example, public health campaigns targeting immigrant populations should be available in multiple languages and consider cultural beliefs about health. Policies that respect and incorporate cultural values have a higher likelihood of acceptance and success.

The fourth essential tip is to focus on prevention rather than cure. Preventive health policies aim to reduce the incidence of diseases rather than just treating them. Programs promoting healthy lifestyles, vaccinations, and early screenings can save healthcare costs and improve quality of life. During recent years, initiatives to combat the obesity epidemic through promoting physical activity and healthy eating have showcased the effectiveness of preventive measures. By emphasizing prevention, communities can reduce overall health burdens.

The fifth tip is to ensure policies are adaptable and flexible. Health challenges are dynamic, changing with time and circumstances. Policies must be able to evolve in response to new evidence, emerging health trends, or unexpected public health crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. For instance, the rapid adaptation of telehealth services during the pandemic illustrated the need for flexibility in health policies. Policymakers should build systems that allow for rapid responses and alterations to health strategies.

Another important aspect is the evaluation of health policies. The sixth tip involves establishing mechanisms for monitoring and evaluating health policies continuously. This step enables policymakers to assess the impact and effectiveness of their initiatives. Regular evaluation ensures that policies are achieving their goals and provides insights for necessary adjustments. Developing metrics for success and collecting feedback from stakeholders will support this process.

The seventh tip highlights the importance of providing adequate funding and resources. Effective health policies need sufficient financial support to be implemented successfully. Funding ensures that programs can run, outreach can occur, and resources can be provided. For example, the expansion of mental health services in communities often relies on dedicated funding. Policymakers must advocate for appropriate allocation of resources to ensure sustainability.

Next, collaboration across sectors is critical. The eighth tip encourages partnerships between health organizations, educational institutions, governmental agencies, and private sectors. Addressing health issues often requires a multi-sectoral approach. For instance, partnerships between schools and health departments to promote healthy eating habits among children can lead to better health outcomes. Collaborative efforts can maximize resources and expertise, creating a larger impact.

The ninth tip is to foster public awareness and education. Educating the public about health issues and available services helps ensure that individuals are informed and empowered. Communication strategies should be clear and accessible, utilizing various platforms, including social media, workshops, and community events. For example, public health campaigns about the importance of vaccinations can significantly influence community participation and health behaviors.

Finally, the tenth essential tip is to maintain a long-term perspective. Effective health policies should not only focus on immediate challenges but also consider the long-term health of communities. Policymakers must plan for future needs and emerging issues, such as an aging population or climate change impacts on health. By adopting a long-term view, health policies can become part of a comprehensive approach to improving public health over time.

In conclusion, developing effective health policies in community health requires attention to various essential elements. By actively engaging stakeholders, utilizing evidence-based practices, incorporating cultural competency, focusing on prevention, ensuring adaptability, evaluating outcomes, providing resources, fostering collaboration, enhancing public awareness, and maintaining a long-term perspective, policymakers can create meaningful changes. As health challenges continue to evolve, these tips will be instrumental in guiding future developments in community health policies, ultimately leading to healthier populations.

References:

Mettert, Cole, Meagan, Caitlin N., Ross C., Hooley, Maura M., Baumann, Jonathan, Cara C., Peg, Dorsey, Mazzucca, Callie, Pilar, Kayne D., Brownson, Kepper, Lewis, Allen, and Stephanie. "Quantitative measures of health policy implementation determinants and outcomes: a systematic review | Implementation Science | Full Text." implementationscience.biomedcentral.com, 01 Dec. 2020, "https://implementationscience.biomedcentral.com/

Penelope Hawe, Charles Deutsch, Joseph E Trimble, Kenneth McLeroy, Jean J Schensul, Robin Lin Miller, Edison J Trickett, Amy J Schulz, Bruce D Rapkin, Sarah Beehler, and Lawrence W Green. "Advancing the Science of Community-Level Interventions - PMC." pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, 01 Aug. 2011, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3134512/.

Nicholas Freudenberg, and Emma Tsui. "Evidence, Power, and Policy Change in Community-Based Participatory Research - PMC." pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, 01 Jan. 2014, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3910045/.

Elham Morshedzadeh. "Full article: Tapping into community expertise: stakeholder engagement in the design process." www.tandfonline.com , https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/25741292.2022.2157130.

Mark G. Embrett. "Social determinants of health and health equity policy research: Exploring the use, misuse, and nonuse of policy analysis theory - ScienceDirect." www.sciencedirect.com, 01 May. 2014, https://www.sciencedirect.com/

Norman, Robinson, Benz, Mai, Hendrie, K. A., Matthew, Suzanne, Welsh, Richard, Cloe, and Locantro. "Community-based participatory-research through co-design: supporting collaboration from all sides of disability | Research Involvement and Engagement | Full Text." researchinvolvement.biomedcentral.com, 01 Dec. 2024, https://researchinvolvement.biomedcentral.com/

Qiaohui Wu, Weixuan Wu, Xueqing Liang, Linjian Wu, and Jun Xu. "Influencing factors of health resource allocation and utilisation before and after COVID-19 based on RIF-I-OLS decomposition method: a longitudinal retrospective study in Guangdong Province, China - PMC." pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, 23 Mar. 2023, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10039974/.

Matthew Carroll, Eli Ristevski, and Tanya Rong. "Exploring community engagement in place-based approaches in areas of poor health and disadvantage: A scoping review - ScienceDirect." www.sciencedirect.com, 01 May. 2023, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1353829223000631.

Improving healthcare access is a critical concern globally, especially in light of the recent COVID-19 pandemic, which has highlighted existing disparities in healthcare delivery. Ensuring that everyone has access to quality healthcare can significantly enhance public health outcomes. Policymakers can adopt various strategies to address this issue effectively. Here are ten public policy strategies that can lead to success in improving healthcare access.

First, expanding Medicaid is essential in assisting low-income individuals. Several states have successfully implemented this strategy, leading to an increase in insured populations and better health indicators.

Second, increasing funding for community health centers can provide essential services in underserved areas, ensuring that individuals receive necessary care regardless of their ability to pay.

Third, promoting telehealth services has gained considerable traction, especially during the pandemic, offering a convenient alternative for patients who live in remote areas or have mobility issues. By investing in telehealth infrastructure, governments can make healthcare services more accessible.

Fourth, integrating social services with healthcare can address the social determinants of health, such as housing or transportation, that affect patients' ability to access care.

Fifth, reducing prescription drug costs is crucial for healthcare access. High medication prices can deter patients from seeking necessary treatments. Recent legislative efforts, such as allowing Medicare to negotiate drug prices, aim to tackle this issue.

Sixth, implementing outreach programs, particularly in marginalized communities, can raise awareness about available healthcare services and encourage individuals to seek care.

Seventh, increasing the healthcare workforce, especially in rural and underserved areas, can alleviate the strain on healthcare facilities and ensure fewer people are left without care. Initiatives like loan forgiveness programs for medical professionals who work in these areas can incentivize service provision.

Eighth, expanding transportation options for patients can enhance access to healthcare facilities, especially in regions where public transport is scarce.

Ninth, fostering partnerships between public health agencies and educational institutions can help train the next generation of healthcare professionals who are sensitive to the diverse needs of communities.

Lastly, ensuring comprehensive health education can empower individuals to make informed health decisions and encourage them to seek care when needed.

In conclusion, improving healthcare access requires deliberate, strategic actions from policymakers. By implementing these ten public policy strategies, societies can work toward a more equitable healthcare system that serves everyone effectively, ultimately leading to better health outcomes for all.

References

Buchmueller, Thomas C., and Colleen M. Grogan. "Medicaid Expansion and Health Coverage for the Uninsured: Evidence from the ACA." The Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 168, no. 6, 2018, pp. 446-447.

Rao, Melissa R., and Jonathan P. Gnanaraj. "The Role of Telehealth in Rural Healthcare Delivery." Journal of Rural Health, vol. 37, no. 4, 2021, pp. 670-675.

U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. "Community Health Centers." HHS.gov, 2022. www.hhs.gov/about/agencies/opa/about/health-centers.html.

The United States healthcare system has been a topic of vigorous debate for decades. With rising costs, disparities in access to care, and varying quality of services, many argue that the system is broken. The historical evolution of the U. S. healthcare system has shaped its current state. Early on, healthcare was primarily a private affair, steeped in traditions where the relationship between a patient and their physician was personal and often of little concern to outside organizations. The introduction of employer-sponsored insurance during World War II fundamentally altered the landscape, as companies began offering health benefits as a way to attract workers in a labor market constrained by wage controls. This model took root in the mid-20th century and paved the way for the proliferation of private insurance.

The 1960s marked a significant turn with the introduction of Medicare and Medicaid. Medicare provided healthcare primarily for individuals over 65 years of age while Medicaid aimed to assist low-income families. These programs expanded access to millions but also set the stage for rising healthcare costs, as they decreased the direct financial burden on consumers. This era highlighted a crucial point: while access improved, the sustainability of such systems came into question as a culture of dependency on government-backed healthcare was born.

The rise of managed care in the 1980s and 1990s tried to curtail escalating costs by incentivizing healthcare providers to offer services within a limited network. However, this model spurred a backlash from consumers who felt their choices were restricted and quality was compromised. The backlash spawned further reforms and discussions about the need for balance between cost-control and patient-centered care.

Comparatively, the U. S. healthcare system can be seen as inadequately addressing the needs of all its citizens. In other countries like Canada, universal healthcare is available, leading to more equitable access and low out-of-pocket expenses for patients. These nations often rank better in population health metrics despite incurring lower costs. This difference raises critical questions about the quality and efficiency of the American healthcare system.

Influential figures have played critical roles in shaping the debate around healthcare reform in the U. S. One notable individual is President Lyndon B. Johnson, who championed Medicare and Medicaid, expanding access significantly. Fast forward to the 2000s, and President Barack Obama’s Affordable Care Act sought to increase insurance coverage and improve access to care. The act mandated that all Americans have health insurance or face penalties, a step seen both as essential for access and as a government overreach by its critics. Similarly, Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders have advocated for “Medicare for All,” pushing for a fully public healthcare option, arguing that such a model could eliminate private insurance bureaucracy and ensure that all Americans receive care without financial hardship.

Public opinions on the U. S. healthcare system vary widely. Many Americans express dissatisfaction with the current system due to high costs and inconsistent quality of care. According to a Gallup poll, concerns about the affordability of healthcare ranked second among the most pressing issues facing the nation. This sentiment is echoed in personal experiences where individuals delay care or face financial ruin even after having insurance.

The debate is also heavily polarized along political lines, affecting the discourse surrounding potential reform. Proponents of a single-payer system argue that moving toward a universal model could lead to healthier populations and lower total healthcare expenditures. They cite countries with successful single-payer systems where administrative costs are significantly lower, and outcomes are better. Detractors argue that such a shift could lead to lengthy wait times, decreased innovation in medical technologies, and increased taxation to fund a new system.

In considering whether the U. S. healthcare system is broken, it is essential to analyze recent developments that have influenced the landscape. The COVID-19 pandemic exposed many vulnerabilities, including the inadequacies of the public health response, exacerbation of disparities based on race and income, and the stress placed on healthcare workers. Many individuals who had lost jobs and, consequently, insurance during the pandemic further highlighted the precariousness of the private insurance model. As Americans faced overwhelming medical bills, new discussions around healthcare reform gained traction.

Technological advancements have also played a role in shaping healthcare in recent years. The rise of telemedicine has shown potential in expanding access to care, particularly for those in rural areas or those dealing with chronic conditions. Yet, the pandemic has also raised questions about equity and access to technology, with low-income individuals often lacking adequate internet access or the means to engage in virtual consultations.

As for future developments, the sustainability of the current healthcare system remains suspect. The trend toward consolidation in healthcare providers and insurance companies could lead to higher costs for consumers and less competition. Additionally, the growing presence of technology in healthcare raises concerns about data privacy, ownership, and accessibility.

Prospective reforms will likely weigh the benefits of a single-payer system against an enhanced public option that retains the private insurance model. There is growing acknowledgment that reform is needed to save costs while ensuring equitable access to care. Whatever the direction, it is clear that a broad consensus must be reached to enact any meaningful changes to the system.

In conclusion, the U. S. healthcare system is challenged by numerous issues, both historical and contemporary. The debate on whether it is broken is multifaceted, with valid points on various sides. The evolution of the system has led to significant achievements in access but has also created disparities and inefficiencies. Influential figures have shaped policy, and public opinion reflects dissatisfaction with the fundamental aspects of the system. The pandemic and its aftermath will undoubtedly influence the future, pushing stakeholders to consider new approaches to healthcare delivery and financing. Overall, it is evident that while there are successful elements within the U. S. healthcare system, the pursuit of a more equitable and efficient system remains a critical task for policymakers.

References

Klein, Ezra. "Why the U.S. Pays So Much for Health Care." The New York Times, 2 July 2021.

Oberlander, Jonathan. "The Political Life of Medicare." The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 386, no. 10, 2022, pp. 931-938.

Starr, Paul. "The Social Transformation of American Medicine." Basic Books, 1982.

Blumenthal, David, et al. "Health Care Coverage in the United States — A New Era." The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 377, no. 16, 2017, pp. 1601-1609.

Squires, Daivd, et al. "The U.S. Health Care System in Perspective." Health Affairs, vol. 39, no. 5, 2020, pp. 856-864.

 VISIT, SUPPORT AND SHARE UNICEF

 VISIT, SHARE AND FOLLOW WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION

WITH OUR ONLINE HEALTH PREVENTION WE SAVED IN LAST YEARS THOUSANDS OF LIFES

We provide free information and opinions as humanitarian aid

We don't raise funds

We don't accept donations

Copyrights protection are secured

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION - NEWS AND TOP STORIES

Worldwide 59.5 million people are displaced –22 million more than a decade ago

Cancer is a large group of diseases that can start in almost any organ or tissue of the body when abnormal cells grow uncontrollably, go beyond their usual boundaries to invade adjoining parts of the body, and/or spread to other organs. The latter process is called metastasizing and is a major cause of death from cancer. A neoplasm and malignant tumour are other common names for cancer.

 Cancer is the second leading cause of death globally, accounting for an estimated 9.6 million deaths, or one in six deaths, in 2018. Lung, prostate, colorectal, stomach, and liver cancer are the most common types of cancer in men, while breast, colorectal, lung, cervical, and thyroid cancer are the most common among women.

The cancer burden continues to grow globally, exerting tremendous physical, emotional, and financial strain on individuals, families, communities, and health systems. Many health systems in low- and middle-income countries are least prepared to manage this burden, and large numbers of cancer patients globally do not have access to timely quality diagnosis and treatment. In countries where health systems are strong, survival rates of many types of cancers are improving thanks to accessible early detection, quality treatment, and survivorship care.

• Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide, accounting for nearly 10 million deaths in 2020, or nearly one in six deaths.
• The most common cancers are breast, lung, colon and rectum and prostate cancers.
• Around one-third of deaths from cancer are due to tobacco use, high body mass index, alcohol consumption, low fruit and vegetable intake, and lack of physical activity.
• Cancer-causing infections, such as human papillomavirus (HPV) and hepatitis, are responsible for approximately 30% of cancer cases in low- and lower-middle-income countries.
• Many cancers can be cured if detected early and treated effectively.

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of death globally, taking an estimated 17.9 million lives each year. CVDs are a group of disorders of the heart and blood vessels and include coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, rheumatic heart disease and other conditions. More than four out of five CVD deaths are due to heart attacks and strokes, and one third of these deaths occur prematurely in people under 70 years of age.

The most important behavioural risk factors of heart disease and stroke are unhealthy diet, physical inactivity, tobacco use and harmful use of alcohol. The effects of behavioural risk factors may show up in individuals as raised blood pressure, raised blood glucose, raised blood lipids, and overweight and obesity. These “intermediate risks factors” can be measured in primary care facilities and indicate an increased risk of heart attack, stroke, heart failure and other complications.

Cessation of tobacco use, reduction of salt in the diet, eating more fruit and vegetables, regular physical activity and avoiding harmful use of alcohol have been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. Health policies that create conducive environments for making healthy choices affordable and available are essential for motivating people to adopt and sustain healthy behaviours.

Identifying those at the highest risk of CVDs and ensuring they receive appropriate treatment can prevent premature deaths. Access to noncommunicable disease medicines and basic health technologies in all primary health care facilities is essential to ensure that those in need receive treatment and counselling.

• Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of death globally.
• An estimated 17.9 million people died from CVDs in 2019, representing 32% of all global deaths. Of these deaths, 85% were due to heart attack and stroke.
• Over three-quarters of CVD deaths take place in low- and middle-income countries.
• Out of the 17 million premature deaths (under the age of 70) due to noncommunicable diseases in 2019, 38% were caused by CVDs.
• Most cardiovascular diseases can be prevented by addressing behavioural risk factors such as tobacco use, unhealthy diet and obesity, physical inactivity, and harmful use of alcohol.
• It is important to detect the cardiovascular disease as early as possible so that management with counselling and medicines can begin.

  Scientific American Mind

Scientific American

THE LANCET

THE LANCET DIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGY

THE LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES

THE LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH

THE LANCET SCIENCE DIRECT

ELSEVIER

THE LANCET ONCOLOGY

NATURE