Is the US healthcare system broken?
The United States healthcare system has been a topic of vigorous debate for decades. With rising costs, disparities in access to care, and varying quality of services, many argue that the system is broken. The historical evolution of the U. S. healthcare system has shaped its current state. Early on, healthcare was primarily a private affair, steeped in traditions where the relationship between a patient and their physician was personal and often of little concern to outside organizations. The introduction of employer-sponsored insurance during World War II fundamentally altered the landscape, as companies began offering health benefits as a way to attract workers in a labor market constrained by wage controls. This model took root in the mid-20th century and paved the way for the proliferation of private insurance.
The 1960s marked a significant turn with the introduction of Medicare and Medicaid. Medicare provided healthcare primarily for individuals over 65 years of age while Medicaid aimed to assist low-income families. These programs expanded access to millions but also set the stage for rising healthcare costs, as they decreased the direct financial burden on consumers. This era highlighted a crucial point: while access improved, the sustainability of such systems came into question as a culture of dependency on government-backed healthcare was born.
The rise of managed care in the 1980s and 1990s tried to curtail escalating costs by incentivizing healthcare providers to offer services within a limited network. However, this model spurred a backlash from consumers who felt their choices were restricted and quality was compromised. The backlash spawned further reforms and discussions about the need for balance between cost-control and patient-centered care.
Comparatively, the U. S. healthcare system can be seen as inadequately addressing the needs of all its citizens. In other countries like Canada, universal healthcare is available, leading to more equitable access and low out-of-pocket expenses for patients. These nations often rank better in population health metrics despite incurring lower costs. This difference raises critical questions about the quality and efficiency of the American healthcare system.
Influential figures have played critical roles in shaping the debate around healthcare reform in the U. S. One notable individual is President Lyndon B. Johnson, who championed Medicare and Medicaid, expanding access significantly. Fast forward to the 2000s, and President Barack Obama’s Affordable Care Act sought to increase insurance coverage and improve access to care. The act mandated that all Americans have health insurance or face penalties, a step seen both as essential for access and as a government overreach by its critics. Similarly, Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders have advocated for “Medicare for All,” pushing for a fully public healthcare option, arguing that such a model could eliminate private insurance bureaucracy and ensure that all Americans receive care without financial hardship.
Public opinions on the U. S. healthcare system vary widely. Many Americans express dissatisfaction with the current system due to high costs and inconsistent quality of care. According to a Gallup poll, concerns about the affordability of healthcare ranked second among the most pressing issues facing the nation. This sentiment is echoed in personal experiences where individuals delay care or face financial ruin even after having insurance.
The debate is also heavily polarized along political lines, affecting the discourse surrounding potential reform. Proponents of a single-payer system argue that moving toward a universal model could lead to healthier populations and lower total healthcare expenditures. They cite countries with successful single-payer systems where administrative costs are significantly lower, and outcomes are better. Detractors argue that such a shift could lead to lengthy wait times, decreased innovation in medical technologies, and increased taxation to fund a new system.
In considering whether the U. S. healthcare system is broken, it is essential to analyze recent developments that have influenced the landscape. The COVID-19 pandemic exposed many vulnerabilities, including the inadequacies of the public health response, exacerbation of disparities based on race and income, and the stress placed on healthcare workers. Many individuals who had lost jobs and, consequently, insurance during the pandemic further highlighted the precariousness of the private insurance model. As Americans faced overwhelming medical bills, new discussions around healthcare reform gained traction.
Technological advancements have also played a role in shaping healthcare in recent years. The rise of telemedicine has shown potential in expanding access to care, particularly for those in rural areas or those dealing with chronic conditions. Yet, the pandemic has also raised questions about equity and access to technology, with low-income individuals often lacking adequate internet access or the means to engage in virtual consultations.
As for future developments, the sustainability of the current healthcare system remains suspect. The trend toward consolidation in healthcare providers and insurance companies could lead to higher costs for consumers and less competition. Additionally, the growing presence of technology in healthcare raises concerns about data privacy, ownership, and accessibility.
Prospective reforms will likely weigh the benefits of a single-payer system against an enhanced public option that retains the private insurance model. There is growing acknowledgment that reform is needed to save costs while ensuring equitable access to care. Whatever the direction, it is clear that a broad consensus must be reached to enact any meaningful changes to the system.
In conclusion, the U. S. healthcare system is challenged by numerous issues, both historical and contemporary. The debate on whether it is broken is multifaceted, with valid points on various sides. The evolution of the system has led to significant achievements in access but has also created disparities and inefficiencies. Influential figures have shaped policy, and public opinion reflects dissatisfaction with the fundamental aspects of the system. The pandemic and its aftermath will undoubtedly influence the future, pushing stakeholders to consider new approaches to healthcare delivery and financing. Overall, it is evident that while there are successful elements within the U. S. healthcare system, the pursuit of a more equitable and efficient system remains a critical task for policymakers.
References
Klein, Ezra. "Why the U.S. Pays So Much for Health Care." The New York Times, 2 July 2021.
Oberlander, Jonathan. "The Political Life of Medicare." The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 386, no. 10, 2022, pp. 931-938.
Starr, Paul. "The Social Transformation of American Medicine." Basic Books, 1982.
Blumenthal, David, et al. "Health Care Coverage in the United States — A New Era." The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 377, no. 16, 2017, pp. 1601-1609.
Squires, Daivd, et al. "The U.S. Health Care System in Perspective." Health Affairs, vol. 39, no. 5, 2020, pp. 856-864.
Ten Myths of Public Policies
Myth 1: Public policies are only for governments
One of the most common myths about public policies is that they are solely the responsibility of governments. While it is true that governments play a crucial role in shaping and implementing public policies, other actors such as non-governmental organizations, advocacy groups, and even individuals can also influence and shape public policies. Public policies are a product of interactions and negotiations between various stakeholders, not just governments.
Myth 2: Public policies are always effective
Another common myth about public policies is that they always achieve their intended goals and objectives. In reality, public policies are often complex and multifaceted, making it difficult to predict their outcomes with certainty. Many factors, such as implementation challenges, unforeseen consequences, and changing societal conditions, can influence the effectiveness of public policies. It is important to acknowledge that public policies are not a panacea and may require continuous monitoring and evaluation to ensure their success.
Myth 3: Public policies are always based on evidence
While evidence-based policymaking is often touted as the gold standard for developing effective public policies, the reality is that many policies are influenced by political considerations, vested interests, and ideological beliefs. Public policies are often the result of compromise and negotiation between various stakeholders, which may not always prioritize evidence-based decision-making. It is crucial to critically assess the evidence and rationale behind public policies to ensure that they are grounded in sound reasoning and analysis.
Myth 4: Public policies are always implemented as intended
A common misconception about public policies is that they are always implemented according to plan. However, the implementation of public policies is often fraught with challenges such as bureaucratic inertia, resource constraints, and opposition from vested interests. Delays, deviations, and failures in implementation are not uncommon in the world of public policy. It is important to recognize the complex nature of policy implementation and to address challenges proactively to ensure the success of public policies.
Myth 5: Public policies are always transparent and inclusive
Transparency and inclusivity are essential principles of good governance, but they are not always upheld in the development and implementation of public policies. Decision-making processes in public policy can often be opaque, dominated by powerful interests, and exclude marginalized communities. Lack of transparency and inclusivity can undermine the legitimacy of public policies and lead to backlash and resistance from the affected populations. It is essential to promote transparency and inclusivity in public policymaking to ensure accountability and legitimacy.
Myth 6: Public policies always prioritize the common good
Public policies are often designed to address societal challenges and promote the common good, but they can also serve the interests of specific groups or individuals. Power dynamics, lobbying, and political considerations can influence the prioritization of certain policies over others, sometimes at the expense of the broader public interest. It is important to critically evaluate the motivations and impacts of public policies to ensure that they truly prioritize the common good and benefit the entire society.
Myth 7: Public policies are always permanent
Public policies are not immutable and can be subject to change and revision over time. While some policies may endure for decades, others may be short-lived or evolve in response to changing circumstances and priorities. Public policies are dynamic and responsive to societal needs and challenges, requiring flexibility and adaptability to remain relevant and effective. It is crucial for policymakers to constantly evaluate and update public policies to ensure their continued relevance and impact.
Myth 8: Public policies are always rational and logical
Public policies are often portrayed as the result of rational decision-making and logical reasoning. However, the reality is that policymaking is a messy and unpredictable process that is influenced by emotions, biases, and power dynamics. Political considerations, public opinion, and personal interests can all influence the development and implementation of public policies, sometimes leading to decisions that may not appear rational or logical. It is important to recognize the complexities of policymaking and to approach it with an open mind and critical perspective.
Myth 9: Public policies are always beneficial
While public policies are intended to address societal challenges and promote the common good, they can also have unintended consequences and negative impacts on certain groups or individuals. Policies that are well-intentioned may result in unintended harms, such as exacerbating inequalities, stifling innovation, or undermining individual rights. It is important to critically evaluate the potential impacts of public policies on all stakeholders and to proactively address any unintended consequences to ensure that policies are truly beneficial for society as a whole.
Myth 10: Public policies are always the best solution
Finally, a common myth about public policies is that they are always the best solution to societal problems. While public policies are a crucial tool for addressing challenges and promoting the common good, they are not always the most effective or appropriate solution. Public policies can be limited by their scope, resources, and political feasibility, and may not always address the root causes of the issues they seek to solve. It is important to consider a range of policy options and approaches when designing solutions to complex societal problems and to critically assess the strengths and limitations of public policies in addressing these challenges.
In conclusion, public policies are a vital component of governance that shape the way we live, work, and interact with one another. By debunking these 10 myths of public policies, we can gain a clearer understanding of their complexity, challenges, and impacts on society. It is crucial to approach public policymaking with a critical and informed perspective, recognizing the nuances and trade-offs involved in developing and implementing effective policies that truly benefit the common good.
Ten fundamental principles in defining medical law
Medical law is a complex and dynamic field that governs the interactions between healthcare providers, patients, and the broader healthcare system. Within this intricate legal framework, there are ten fundamental principles that serve as guiding principles in defining and understanding medical law.
The first fundamental principle in medical law is autonomy. Autonomy refers to the right of individuals to make decisions about their own bodies and medical treatment. This principle is deeply rooted in the idea of informed consent, which requires healthcare providers to provide patients with all relevant information about their medical condition, treatment options, and potential risks and benefits, so that patients can make informed decisions about their care.
The second principle is beneficence, which obligates healthcare providers to act in the best interests of their patients and to do no harm. This principle emphasizes the importance of providing high-quality care and prioritizing the well-being of patients above all else.
The third principle is nonmaleficence, which is closely related to beneficence. Nonmaleficence requires healthcare providers to avoid causing harm to their patients and to minimize any risks associated with medical treatment.
The fourth principle is justice, which emphasizes the fair and equitable distribution of healthcare resources and access to care. This principle highlights the importance of ensuring that all individuals have equal access to healthcare services and that healthcare decisions are made fairly and without bias.
The fifth principle is confidentiality, which requires healthcare providers to protect the privacy of their patients and to safeguard their medical information. Confidentiality is essential for building trust between patients and healthcare providers and for ensuring the security of sensitive medical information.
The sixth principle is veracity, which requires healthcare providers to be honest and truthful in their communications with patients. It is crucial for maintaining trust and transparency in the patient-provider relationship.
The seventh principle is privacy, which protects individuals from unwanted intrusion into their personal lives and medical information. Privacy is a fundamental human right and is essential for maintaining individual dignity and autonomy.
The eighth principle is competence, which requires healthcare providers to possess the knowledge, skills, and judgment necessary to deliver high-quality care to their patients. Competence is essential for ensuring patient safety and the effectiveness of medical treatment.
The ninth principle is continuity of care, which emphasizes the importance of providing seamless and coordinated care to patients across different healthcare settings and providers. Continuity of care is essential for ensuring optimal patient outcomes and improving the overall quality of healthcare delivery.
The final principle is accountability, which requires healthcare providers to take responsibility for their actions and decisions and to be held accountable for any errors or misconduct. Accountability is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the healthcare system and for ensuring that patients receive safe and effective care.
In conclusion, these ten fundamental principles serve as the bedrock of medical law and provide essential guidance for healthcare providers, patients, and policymakers. By upholding these principles, we can promote ethical conduct, patient-centered care, and a just and equitable healthcare system for all.
Copyrighted Academy of Public Policies
COSMETIC DENTISTRY
Cosmetic dentistry is a branch of dental care that focuses on improving the appearance of a person's teeth, gums, and smile. This field has evolved significantly over the years, with advancements in technology, materials, and techniques leading to a wide range of options for patients looking to enhance their smiles. Cosmetic dentistry has a long history that dates back to ancient civilizations. The ancient Egyptians, for example, used various materials such as gold and ivory to restore missing teeth and improve the appearance of their smiles. In ancient Rome, metal bands were used to bind loose teeth together, providing a primitive form of orthodontic treatment. However, it was not until the 18th century that significant advancements in cosmetic dentistry began to emerge. One of the key figures in the history of cosmetic dentistry is Pierre Fauchard, a French dentist often referred to as the "father of modern dentistry." Fauchard published a groundbreaking book in 1728 titled "The Surgeon Dentist", in which he outlined various techniques for restoring and improving the appearance of teeth. This book laid the foundation for modern cosmetic dentistry and inspired generations of dentists to further develop the field. In the 20th century, cosmetic dentistry experienced rapid advancements as new materials and techniques were introduced. One of the most significant developments was the invention of dental veneers in the 1920s, which allowed dentists to cover up imperfections in teeth and create a more aesthetically pleasing smile. In the 1950s, the first tooth whitening treatments became available, enabling patients to achieve brighter, whiter smiles. The introduction of dental implants in the 1980s revolutionized the field of cosmetic dentistry, providing a permanent solution for missing teeth and vastly improving the quality of life for patients. In the 1990s, the development of computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology enabled dentists to create custom crowns, veneers, and other restorations with unparalleled precision and accuracy. Throughout history, there have been numerous individuals who have made significant contributions to the field of cosmetic dentistry. One such figure is Dr. Charles Pincus, a dentist who is credited with inventing the first dental veneers in the 1920s. Pincus's invention paved the way for the widespread use of veneers in cosmetic dentistry and transformed the way dentists could improve the appearance of their patients' smiles.Another influential figure in the field is Dr. Larry Rosenthal, a renowned cosmetic dentist known for his work on celebrity smiles. Rosenthal is considered a pioneer in the use of porcelain veneers and has helped popularize cosmetic dentistry among the general public. His work has been widely praised for its natural-looking results and has set the standard for excellence in the field. The impact of cosmetic dentistry on individuals can be profound, with many patients experiencing a significant boost in self-confidence and overall well-being after undergoing cosmetic dental treatments. A bright, healthy smile can enhance a person's appearance, improve their social and professional interactions, and even positively impact their mental health. Cosmetic dentistry has the power to transform lives and help individuals feel more comfortable and confident in their own skin. On a societal level, cosmetic dentistry has also had a significant impact by raising awareness of the importance of oral health and hygiene. The popularity of cosmetic procedures has led to a greater emphasis on preventive care and regular dental check-ups, helping to reduce the incidence of dental problems and improve overall oral health in the population. Several individuals have played a key role in shaping the field of cosmetic dentistry and advancing its practice. Dr. Bill Dorfman, known as the "dentist to the stars," is a highly respected cosmetic dentist who has treated numerous celebrities and transformed their smiles. Dorfman is a pioneer in the use of laser dentistry and has developed innovative techniques for whitening teeth and creating beautiful, natural-looking restorations.
Another influential figure in the field is Dr. Michael Apa, a cosmetic dentist renowned for his expertise in creating flawless smiles using porcelain veneers. Apa's work has been featured in numerous publications and television shows, earning him a reputation as a leading authority in cosmetic dentistry. His innovative approach to smile design and commitment to excellence have set him apart as a trailblazer in the field. While cosmetic dentistry has undeniably transformed the field of dentistry and improved the lives of countless individuals, it has also been met with some criticism and skepticism. Some detractors argue that cosmetic procedures are purely aesthetic and do not address underlying dental issues, leading to a focus on appearance over health. Others raise concerns about the safety and long-term effects of certain cosmetic treatments, such as teeth whitening or veneers. However, proponents of cosmetic dentistry argue that the field offers numerous benefits beyond improving appearance, such as restoring function, preventing further dental problems, and boosting self-esteem. Cosmetic treatments can also be a key part of a comprehensive treatment plan for patients with complex dental issues, helping them achieve a healthy, beautiful smile that enhances their overall quality of life.As technology continues to advance and new materials and techniques become available, the future of cosmetic dentistry looks promising. Innovations such as 3D printing, digital scanning, and virtual smile design software are already revolutionizing the field, allowing dentists to create custom restorations with unprecedented precision and accuracy. These technologies are making cosmetic treatments more accessible, efficient, and cost-effective for patients. In the coming years, we can expect to see further advancements in minimally invasive procedures, regenerative therapies, and personalized treatment plans tailored to each individual's unique needs and goals. The integration of artificial intelligence and digital technologies into dental practices will also streamline the treatment process and improve outcomes for patients. Overall, the future of cosmetic dentistry holds great potential for continued growth and innovation in the years to come.
Karolinska University Hospital (with collaboration of Dr. Azadeh Ghorbani)
Humanitarian Health Care Prevention
VISIT, SUPPORT AND SHARE UNICEF
VISIT, SHARE AND FOLLOW WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION
WITH OUR ONLINE HEALTH PREVENTION WE SAVED IN LAST YEARS THOUSANDS OF LIFES
We provide free information and opinions as humanitarian aid
We don't raise funds
We don't accept donations
Copyrights protection are secured
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION - NEWS AND TOP STORIES
Worldwide 59.5 million people are displaced –22 million more than a decade ago
Cancer is a large group of diseases that can start in almost any organ or tissue of the body when abnormal cells grow uncontrollably, go beyond their usual boundaries to invade adjoining parts of the body, and/or spread to other organs. The latter process is called metastasizing and is a major cause of death from cancer. A neoplasm and malignant tumour are other common names for cancer.
Cancer is the second leading cause of death globally, accounting for an estimated 9.6 million deaths, or one in six deaths, in 2018. Lung, prostate, colorectal, stomach, and liver cancer are the most common types of cancer in men, while breast, colorectal, lung, cervical, and thyroid cancer are the most common among women.
The cancer burden continues to grow globally, exerting tremendous physical, emotional, and financial strain on individuals, families, communities, and health systems. Many health systems in low- and middle-income countries are least prepared to manage this burden, and large numbers of cancer patients globally do not have access to timely quality diagnosis and treatment. In countries where health systems are strong, survival rates of many types of cancers are improving thanks to accessible early detection, quality treatment, and survivorship care.
- Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide, accounting for nearly 10 million deaths in 2020, or nearly one in six deaths.
- The most common cancers are breast, lung, colon and rectum and prostate cancers.
- Around one-third of deaths from cancer are due to tobacco use, high body mass index, alcohol consumption, low fruit and vegetable intake, and lack of physical activity.
- Cancer-causing infections, such as human papillomavirus (HPV) and hepatitis, are responsible for approximately 30% of cancer cases in low- and lower-middle-income countries.
- Many cancers can be cured if detected early and treated effectively.
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of death globally, taking an estimated 17.9 million lives each year. CVDs are a group of disorders of the heart and blood vessels and include coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, rheumatic heart disease and other conditions. More than four out of five CVD deaths are due to heart attacks and strokes, and one third of these deaths occur prematurely in people under 70 years of age.
The most important behavioural risk factors of heart disease and stroke are unhealthy diet, physical inactivity, tobacco use and harmful use of alcohol. The effects of behavioural risk factors may show up in individuals as raised blood pressure, raised blood glucose, raised blood lipids, and overweight and obesity. These “intermediate risks factors” can be measured in primary care facilities and indicate an increased risk of heart attack, stroke, heart failure and other complications.
Cessation of tobacco use, reduction of salt in the diet, eating more fruit and vegetables, regular physical activity and avoiding harmful use of alcohol have been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. Health policies that create conducive environments for making healthy choices affordable and available are essential for motivating people to adopt and sustain healthy behaviours.
Identifying those at the highest risk of CVDs and ensuring they receive appropriate treatment can prevent premature deaths. Access to noncommunicable disease medicines and basic health technologies in all primary health care facilities is essential to ensure that those in need receive treatment and counselling.
- Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of death globally.
- An estimated 17.9 million people died from CVDs in 2019, representing 32% of all global deaths. Of these deaths, 85% were due to heart attack and stroke.
- Over three-quarters of CVD deaths take place in low- and middle-income countries.
- Out of the 17 million premature deaths (under the age of 70) due to noncommunicable diseases in 2019, 38% were caused by CVDs.
- Most cardiovascular diseases can be prevented by addressing behavioural risk factors such as tobacco use, unhealthy diet and obesity, physical inactivity, and harmful use of alcohol.
- It is important to detect the cardiovascular disease as early as possible so that management with counselling and medicines can begin.
THE LANCET DIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGY
THE LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES
